Ofício do magistrado do distrito de Xiangshan, Yang, ao procurador de Macau, sobre a indagação feita a um navio francês que está nas águas da Taipa
This abstract describes a historical document fragment held under archival reference T 60, comprising an official Chinese administrative order issued in the Qianlong 42nd year, ninth month (September 1777), as confirmed by a central circular red seal. The document originates from a county office’s B...
Saved in:
| Format: | Manuscripts |
|---|---|
| Published: |
1777-10-21
|
| Subjects: |
Canton System
;
Chinese community leaders (mín mù)
;
Danish–Norwegian vessel Nielsen
;
Dutch merchant vessels Monba and Nielsen
;
German-Speaking Parish Administration
;
Guangzhou Prefecture Administration
;
Historical Ecclesiastical Record
;
Humen
;
Imperial directives
;
Jiuzhou Yang
;
Macau Military Command
;
Qianlong Era Administrative Order
;
Qing Dynasty administrative document
;
Tanzi Bay
;
Xiangshan County Magistracy
;
outer anchorage off Macau
;
silver cargo
;
unauthorized foreign boarding
;
Manuscripts
|
| Online Access: | https://macau-legacy.usj.edu.mo/docs/3I2KJ6ZC/viewer_3I2KJ6ZC.html |
| Summary: | This abstract describes a historical document fragment held under archival reference T 60, comprising an official Chinese administrative order issued in the Qianlong 42nd year, ninth month (September 1777), as confirmed by a central circular red seal. The document originates from a county office’s Bamboo Division and authorises First Class Clerk Liang Chang to collect and submit documents daily to the Waiting Room for Processing, with marginal annotation confirming its routine administrative character. It bears two official red seals: one imperial date seal and one partially preserved rectangular county yamen seal containing the characters for ‘county’ (xiàn) and ‘seal’ (yìn). The main text is legible, though a signature or seal impression at the conclusion remains illegible—recorded as approximately three characters—and a further fragment at the upper edge is cropped and illegible—recorded as approximately four characters. No substantive Portuguese or Luso-African textual content is present; the references to Kraken transcription failure, ink corrosion, palaeographic complexity, and Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino pertain solely to a separate, unrelated digitisation context and are not features of this document. Researchers requiring verification of script or contextual interpretation are advised to consult the original physical item and engage specialist sinological palaeographic review. |
|---|