Papel queimado: trata da pensão ao Bispo resignatário de Macau.
This archival document is a formal diplomatic correspondence dated May 1802, originating from Lisbon and addressed to an unnamed ecclesiastical authority—likely the Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith or a senior Vatican official. Authored by the Viscount of Balsamã...
Saved in:
| 格式: | Documents |
|---|---|
| 语言: | 意大利语 |
| 出版: |
1802
|
| 主题: | |
| 在线阅读: | https://macau-legacy.usj.edu.mo/docs/55HM8VNZ/viewer_55HM8VNZ.html |
| 标签: |
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
| 总结: | This archival document is a formal diplomatic correspondence dated May 1802, originating from Lisbon and addressed to an unnamed ecclesiastical authority—likely the Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith or a senior Vatican official. Authored by the Viscount of Balsamão, Minister and Secretary for Internal Affairs of Portugal with special responsibility for Ecclesiastical Affairs, the letter concerns the resignation of the Bishop of Macau and the absence of a pension provision for his retirement. It references the involvement of the ‘Xasay’—a term appearing in the contextual heading ‘Orient’ and linked to the ‘Vizho matter’—and cites historical precedent from the pontificate of Pope Paul V (1605–1621) regarding delayed episcopal confirmations due to similar omissions. The document identifies Veselio Zà Renkoy as the correspondent in the ‘Orient’ section, with reference number 26-91 and location Macao; it further notes the satisfaction of Reverend Father Emmanuel of Saint Gualdino and the consolation of the resigning bishop. Situated within Portuguese ecclesiastical administration during the Napoleonic era, the text illuminates colonial-era church governance, financial provisions for retiring prelates, and intergovernmental coordination between Lisbon and the Holy See concerning the Diocese of Macau. Researchers will find this source valuable for studying late-eighteenth- to early-nineteenth-century Catholic missionary infrastructure, Portuguese imperial ecclesiastical policy, and administrative practices in East Asian dioceses under Portuguese patronage. Doc. 29 |
|---|