FROM SIAM TO GUANGDONG AND MACAO : A NOTE ON THE MONGOOSE IN MING AND QING SOURCES從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄

The article proposes a philological and historiographic reading of references to the “mongoose” (menggui 蒙貴/蒙貴 with variable characters) in Chinese sources from the Ming and Qing periods, focusing on the circulation of descriptions between Siam (Xianluo 暹羅), Guangdong, and Macau. Drawing on informat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Roderich Ptak
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau July 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40039/3137
_version_ 1877196270408302592
author Roderich Ptak
author_autocomplete Roderich Ptak
author_browse Roderich Ptak
author_facet Roderich Ptak
Roderich Ptak
author_sort Roderich Ptak
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 39
container_volume_str 39
description The article proposes a philological and historiographic reading of references to the “mongoose” (menggui 蒙貴/蒙貴 with variable characters) in Chinese sources from the Ming and Qing periods, focusing on the circulation of descriptions between Siam (Xianluo 暹羅), Guangdong, and Macau. Drawing on information from the *Aomen jilüe* 澳門記略 (1751), the author observes that the characterization of the animal—resemblance to a cat, long legs, hairy tail, three color varieties, and utility in rat hunting—also appears with remarkable proximity in Qu Dajun (*Guangdong xinyu* 廣東新語, c. 1700). The methodology consists of comparing entries and descriptive sequences across relevant compilations and treatises, including the *Guangdong tongzhi*, *Tong ya* (1636/1666), *Nan Yue biji*, and above all, the *Hai yu* 海語 by Huang Zhong (1536), which explicitly links the animal to “Thailand” and records lexical variants such as *mengju*/muɐkœy. The main conclusions indicate that the “Siam–Guangdong–Macau” constellation does not derive from a simple episodic importation, but from a long duration of circulation of animals and zoological knowledge, mediated by compilatory practices and phonetic correspondences with southern traditions. Thus, the article suggests that “exoticisms” in Macau reflect networks of textual and commercial transmission, rather than merely local observation or narrative intent.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:57Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-7KA7J6HC
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:57Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:57Z
publishDate July 2011
publishDateRange 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling FROM SIAM TO GUANGDONG AND MACAO : A NOTE ON THE MONGOOSE IN MING AND QING SOURCES從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄
The article proposes a philological and historiographic reading of references to the “mongoose” (menggui 蒙貴/蒙貴 with variable characters) in Chinese sources from the Ming and Qing periods, focusing on the circulation of descriptions between Siam (Xianluo 暹羅), Guangdong, and Macau. Drawing on information from the *Aomen jilüe* 澳門記略 (1751), the author observes that the characterization of the animal—resemblance to a cat, long legs, hairy tail, three color varieties, and utility in rat hunting—also appears with remarkable proximity in Qu Dajun (*Guangdong xinyu* 廣東新語, c. 1700). The methodology consists of comparing entries and descriptive sequences across relevant compilations and treatises, including the *Guangdong tongzhi*, *Tong ya* (1636/1666), *Nan Yue biji*, and above all, the *Hai yu* 海語 by Huang Zhong (1536), which explicitly links the animal to “Thailand” and records lexical variants such as *mengju*/muɐkœy. The main conclusions indicate that the “Siam–Guangdong–Macau” constellation does not derive from a simple episodic importation, but from a long duration of circulation of animals and zoological knowledge, mediated by compilatory practices and phonetic correspondences with southern traditions. Thus, the article suggests that “exoticisms” in Macau reflect networks of textual and commercial transmission, rather than merely local observation or narrative intent.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
July 2011
Roderich Ptak
spellingShingle FROM SIAM TO GUANGDONG AND MACAO : A NOTE ON THE MONGOOSE IN MING AND QING SOURCES從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄
Roderich Ptak
title FROM SIAM TO GUANGDONG AND MACAO : A NOTE ON THE MONGOOSE IN MING AND QING SOURCES從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄
title_autocomplete FROM SIAM TO GUANGDONG AND MACAO : A NOTE ON THE MONGOOSE IN MING AND QING SOURCES從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄
title_full FROM SIAM TO GUANGDONG AND MACAO : A NOTE ON THE MONGOOSE IN MING AND QING SOURCES從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄
title_fullStr FROM SIAM TO GUANGDONG AND MACAO : A NOTE ON THE MONGOOSE IN MING AND QING SOURCES從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄
title_full_unstemmed FROM SIAM TO GUANGDONG AND MACAO : A NOTE ON THE MONGOOSE IN MING AND QING SOURCES從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄
title_short FROM SIAM TO GUANGDONG AND MACAO : A NOTE ON THE MONGOOSE IN MING AND QING SOURCES從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄
title_sort from siam to guangdong and macao : a note on the mongoose in ming and qing sources從暹邏到廣東和澳門:明清資料中對貓鼬的記錄
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40039/3137
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH