ARMS AND THE ASIAN. REVISITING EUROPEAN FIREARMS AND THEIR PLACE IN EARLY MODERN ASIA武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置

The article reexamines the so-called "paradox" of European warfare—between the promise of technological superiority and logistical, tactical, and institutional contingencies—by investigating the place of firearms on the Asian continent between roughly 1500 and 1800. In dialogue with the "Military Re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Sanjay Subrahamanyam & Geoffrey Parker
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau April 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40026/3655
_version_ 1877196270828781568
author Sanjay Subrahamanyam & Geoffrey Parker
author_autocomplete Sanjay Subrahamanyam & Geoffrey Parker
author_browse Sanjay Subrahamanyam & Geoffrey Parker
author_facet Sanjay Subrahamanyam & Geoffrey Parker
Sanjay Subrahamanyam & Geoffrey Parker
author_sort Sanjay Subrahamanyam & Geoffrey Parker
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 26
container_volume_str 26
description The article reexamines the so-called "paradox" of European warfare—between the promise of technological superiority and logistical, tactical, and institutional contingencies—by investigating the place of firearms on the Asian continent between roughly 1500 and 1800. In dialogue with the "Military Revolution Debate," the authors argue that the effectiveness of European weapons in Asia cannot be explained by a linear transfer of technology, but rather by local dynamics that include military organization, supply infrastructure, fortress design, and forms of adaptation on the part of different powers. Methodologically, the text articulates a comparative and transregional approach, analyzing how artillery, handguns, and fortifications interrelated across diverse political and military contexts, contrasting the global European experience (from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean routes) with trajectories of change within Europe itself. As a result, it is argued that firearms functioned as selective catalysts: in certain conjunctures they contributed to tactical imbalances and to the offensive, while in others they were neutralized by defensive adaptations, material limitations, and strategies that restored the advantage of defenders. Thus, the "military revolution" must be understood as a historically situated process, rather than as a universal explanation of European power.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:55Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-AJUA2AQE
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:55Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:55Z
publishDate April 2008
publishDateRange 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling ARMS AND THE ASIAN. REVISITING EUROPEAN FIREARMS AND THEIR PLACE IN EARLY MODERN ASIA武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置
The article reexamines the so-called "paradox" of European warfare—between the promise of technological superiority and logistical, tactical, and institutional contingencies—by investigating the place of firearms on the Asian continent between roughly 1500 and 1800. In dialogue with the "Military Revolution Debate," the authors argue that the effectiveness of European weapons in Asia cannot be explained by a linear transfer of technology, but rather by local dynamics that include military organization, supply infrastructure, fortress design, and forms of adaptation on the part of different powers. Methodologically, the text articulates a comparative and transregional approach, analyzing how artillery, handguns, and fortifications interrelated across diverse political and military contexts, contrasting the global European experience (from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean routes) with trajectories of change within Europe itself. As a result, it is argued that firearms functioned as selective catalysts: in certain conjunctures they contributed to tactical imbalances and to the offensive, while in others they were neutralized by defensive adaptations, material limitations, and strategies that restored the advantage of defenders. Thus, the "military revolution" must be understood as a historically situated process, rather than as a universal explanation of European power.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
April 2008
Sanjay Subrahamanyam & Geoffrey Parker
spellingShingle ARMS AND THE ASIAN. REVISITING EUROPEAN FIREARMS AND THEIR PLACE IN EARLY MODERN ASIA武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置
Sanjay Subrahamanyam & Geoffrey Parker
title ARMS AND THE ASIAN. REVISITING EUROPEAN FIREARMS AND THEIR PLACE IN EARLY MODERN ASIA武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置
title_autocomplete ARMS AND THE ASIAN. REVISITING EUROPEAN FIREARMS AND THEIR PLACE IN EARLY MODERN ASIA武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置
title_full ARMS AND THE ASIAN. REVISITING EUROPEAN FIREARMS AND THEIR PLACE IN EARLY MODERN ASIA武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置
title_fullStr ARMS AND THE ASIAN. REVISITING EUROPEAN FIREARMS AND THEIR PLACE IN EARLY MODERN ASIA武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置
title_full_unstemmed ARMS AND THE ASIAN. REVISITING EUROPEAN FIREARMS AND THEIR PLACE IN EARLY MODERN ASIA武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置
title_short ARMS AND THE ASIAN. REVISITING EUROPEAN FIREARMS AND THEIR PLACE IN EARLY MODERN ASIA武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置
title_sort arms and the asian. revisiting european firearms and their place in early modern asia武器與亞洲人:歐洲槍砲以及它們在近代初期亞洲的位置
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40026/3655
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH