SOLDADOS CASADOS,CLÉRIGOS E “GENTIOS ” A SOCIEDADE NO IMPÉRIO LUSO-ORIENTAL SEGUNDO C. R. BOXER查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會

This article proposes an interpretative synthesis of Charles R. Boxer’s approach to society in the Luso-Oriental Empire (16th–18th centuries), articulating his concept of a “Civil Empire” with the social framework of the “State of India.” Starting from the premise that Boxer’s category extends beyon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Vitor Teixeira
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40047/2368
_version_ 1877196270118895616
author Vitor Teixeira
author_autocomplete Vitor Teixeira
author_browse Vitor Teixeira
author_facet Vitor Teixeira
Vitor Teixeira
author_sort Vitor Teixeira
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 47
container_volume_str 47
description This article proposes an interpretative synthesis of Charles R. Boxer’s approach to society in the Luso-Oriental Empire (16th–18th centuries), articulating his concept of a “Civil Empire” with the social framework of the “State of India.” Starting from the premise that Boxer’s category extends beyond the strictly social plane to encompass forms of occupation, economic exploitation, political networks, and missionary methodologies, the study organizes the societal portrait based on the main groups Boxer identifies: soldiers (including unmarried “soldiers”), “casados”/settlers, clergy, and also marginal segments such as vagabonds, adventurers, and beggars. The analysis emphasizes how the image of the Portuguese empire is defined less by a coherent military “machine” and more by a historical structure marked by social processes and practices of governance, especially considering the implicit contrast with the Spanish/overseas “Military Empire.” Methodologically, the text operates as a critical and contextual reading of Boxer, discussing its assumptions and limitations (including the debate on “racial discrimination” and the underanalysis of the Far East) and, from there, advances an interpretative conclusion: the Luso model in the East would have operated more according to civil logics than military ones, albeit traversed by conflicts, fragilities, and reorganizations of power.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:58Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-HBVLTTMV
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:58Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:58Z
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling SOLDADOS CASADOS,CLÉRIGOS E “GENTIOS ” A SOCIEDADE NO IMPÉRIO LUSO-ORIENTAL SEGUNDO C. R. BOXER查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會
This article proposes an interpretative synthesis of Charles R. Boxer’s approach to society in the Luso-Oriental Empire (16th–18th centuries), articulating his concept of a “Civil Empire” with the social framework of the “State of India.” Starting from the premise that Boxer’s category extends beyond the strictly social plane to encompass forms of occupation, economic exploitation, political networks, and missionary methodologies, the study organizes the societal portrait based on the main groups Boxer identifies: soldiers (including unmarried “soldiers”), “casados”/settlers, clergy, and also marginal segments such as vagabonds, adventurers, and beggars. The analysis emphasizes how the image of the Portuguese empire is defined less by a coherent military “machine” and more by a historical structure marked by social processes and practices of governance, especially considering the implicit contrast with the Spanish/overseas “Military Empire.” Methodologically, the text operates as a critical and contextual reading of Boxer, discussing its assumptions and limitations (including the debate on “racial discrimination” and the underanalysis of the Far East) and, from there, advances an interpretative conclusion: the Luso model in the East would have operated more according to civil logics than military ones, albeit traversed by conflicts, fragilities, and reorganizations of power.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
2014
Vitor Teixeira
spellingShingle SOLDADOS CASADOS,CLÉRIGOS E “GENTIOS ” A SOCIEDADE NO IMPÉRIO LUSO-ORIENTAL SEGUNDO C. R. BOXER查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會
Vitor Teixeira
title SOLDADOS CASADOS,CLÉRIGOS E “GENTIOS ” A SOCIEDADE NO IMPÉRIO LUSO-ORIENTAL SEGUNDO C. R. BOXER查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會
title_autocomplete SOLDADOS CASADOS,CLÉRIGOS E “GENTIOS ” A SOCIEDADE NO IMPÉRIO LUSO-ORIENTAL SEGUNDO C. R. BOXER查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會
title_full SOLDADOS CASADOS,CLÉRIGOS E “GENTIOS ” A SOCIEDADE NO IMPÉRIO LUSO-ORIENTAL SEGUNDO C. R. BOXER查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會
title_fullStr SOLDADOS CASADOS,CLÉRIGOS E “GENTIOS ” A SOCIEDADE NO IMPÉRIO LUSO-ORIENTAL SEGUNDO C. R. BOXER查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會
title_full_unstemmed SOLDADOS CASADOS,CLÉRIGOS E “GENTIOS ” A SOCIEDADE NO IMPÉRIO LUSO-ORIENTAL SEGUNDO C. R. BOXER查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會
title_short SOLDADOS CASADOS,CLÉRIGOS E “GENTIOS ” A SOCIEDADE NO IMPÉRIO LUSO-ORIENTAL SEGUNDO C. R. BOXER查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會
title_sort soldados casados,clérigos e “gentios ” a sociedade no império luso-oriental segundo c. r. boxer查爾斯‧博克塞眼中的葡屬東方帝國社會
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40047/2368
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH