ENTRE INFERNOS : UMA PONTE OU UM ABISMO?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?

The article discusses the configuration of "hells" in Sino-Taoist religious thought and examines their relationship with models of earthly justice, proposing that the image of punishment in the afterlife constitutes not merely a moral metaphor, but a cultural device that articulates law, governance,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Anabela Leandro dos Santos
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40048/2350
_version_ 1877196270089535488
author Anabela Leandro dos Santos
author_autocomplete Anabela Leandro dos Santos
author_browse Anabela Leandro dos Santos
author_facet Anabela Leandro dos Santos
Anabela Leandro dos Santos
author_sort Anabela Leandro dos Santos
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 48
container_volume_str 48
description The article discusses the configuration of "hells" in Sino-Taoist religious thought and examines their relationship with models of earthly justice, proposing that the image of punishment in the afterlife constitutes not merely a moral metaphor, but a cultural device that articulates law, governance, and social order. Based on the hypothesis that a structural analogy exists between underworld courts and human judicial practices, the author argues that infernal punitive rituals mobilize principles intended to be equivalent to Chinese positive law, customary norms, and even categories associated with "natural law" — engaging in a dynamic between transcendence and legality. The analysis, supported by theoretical frameworks on punishment and power (including comparative readings of Ruthven and historiographic references on the Western evolution of "torments"), compares the corporal logic of punishment — at times as retrospective retribution, at others as a mechanism of coercion — with the ambivalence present in both torture and infernal punishments. It concludes that, although Western modernity tends to shift punishment toward correction and discipline, the visual and normative culture of hells in China preserves the centrality of the body, integrating it into theologies, Confucian precepts, and mechanisms of religious justice.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:58Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-IGF65BYZ
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:58Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:58Z
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling ENTRE INFERNOS : UMA PONTE OU UM ABISMO?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?
The article discusses the configuration of "hells" in Sino-Taoist religious thought and examines their relationship with models of earthly justice, proposing that the image of punishment in the afterlife constitutes not merely a moral metaphor, but a cultural device that articulates law, governance, and social order. Based on the hypothesis that a structural analogy exists between underworld courts and human judicial practices, the author argues that infernal punitive rituals mobilize principles intended to be equivalent to Chinese positive law, customary norms, and even categories associated with "natural law" — engaging in a dynamic between transcendence and legality. The analysis, supported by theoretical frameworks on punishment and power (including comparative readings of Ruthven and historiographic references on the Western evolution of "torments"), compares the corporal logic of punishment — at times as retrospective retribution, at others as a mechanism of coercion — with the ambivalence present in both torture and infernal punishments. It concludes that, although Western modernity tends to shift punishment toward correction and discipline, the visual and normative culture of hells in China preserves the centrality of the body, integrating it into theologies, Confucian precepts, and mechanisms of religious justice.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
2014
Anabela Leandro dos Santos
spellingShingle ENTRE INFERNOS : UMA PONTE OU UM ABISMO?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?
Anabela Leandro dos Santos
title ENTRE INFERNOS : UMA PONTE OU UM ABISMO?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?
title_autocomplete ENTRE INFERNOS : UMA PONTE OU UM ABISMO?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?
title_full ENTRE INFERNOS : UMA PONTE OU UM ABISMO?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?
title_fullStr ENTRE INFERNOS : UMA PONTE OU UM ABISMO?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?
title_full_unstemmed ENTRE INFERNOS : UMA PONTE OU UM ABISMO?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?
title_short ENTRE INFERNOS : UMA PONTE OU UM ABISMO?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?
title_sort entre infernos : uma ponte ou um abismo?在地獄之間:橋樑或深淵?
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40048/2350
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH