ICAS 8 AND THE RISE OF ASIA第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起
The article argues that the “rise of Asia” should be interpreted not only as a material phenomenon—expressed by the increasing regional economic and political weight—but also as an epistemological challenge to the social sciences and humanities. From this premise, the text maintains that theoretical...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Review of Culture |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Articles |
| Published: |
Instituto Cultural de Macau
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40045/2400 |
| _version_ | 1877196270236336128 |
|---|---|
| author | Tak-Wing Ngo |
| author_autocomplete | Tak-Wing Ngo |
| author_browse | Tak-Wing Ngo |
| author_facet | Tak-Wing Ngo Tak-Wing Ngo |
| author_sort | Tak-Wing Ngo |
| container_title | Review of Culture |
| container_title_str | Review of Culture |
| container_volume | 45 |
| container_volume_str | 45 |
| description | The article argues that the “rise of Asia” should be interpreted not only as a material phenomenon—expressed by the increasing regional economic and political weight—but also as an epistemological challenge to the social sciences and humanities. From this premise, the text maintains that theoretical categories inherited predominantly from the West (state and market, governance and rules, nation and identity, network and hierarchy) reveal limitations in capturing the complexity and hybridity of Asian experiences, marked by long traditions of social organization and by specific norms of power and order. Methodologically, the article operates as an institutional and evidence-based reflection on the function of the International Convention of Asian Scholars (ICAS): by analyzing the relevance of ICAS 8—held in Macau in June 2013—the author identifies how the diversity of participants and the transcontinental circulation of research create a privileged space to “recalibrate” conceptual vocabularies and produce more adequate analytical tools. It concludes that the rapid transformations experienced in multiple Asian countries offer a comparative historical laboratory capable of highlighting recurring paradoxes (electoral competition with daily control, nationalist ideologies with local fragmentations, market liberalization with state monopolies) and, thus, driving the theoretical renewal necessary to understand “Asia” in a substantive manner. |
| first_indexed | 2026-09-11T02:56:58Z |
| format | Articles |
| genre | Articles |
| genre_facet | Articles |
| hierarchy_browse | Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH |
| hierarchy_parent_id | zotero-coll-76L3BRGH |
| hierarchy_parent_title | Review of Culture |
| hierarchy_sequence | 0000 |
| hierarchy_top_id | zotero-coll-WX87PJHD |
| hierarchy_top_title | News |
| hierarchytype | Default |
| id | zotero-IUBR5GL8 |
| institution | zotero_group |
| issn | 1682-1106 |
| last_indexed | 2026-09-11T02:56:58Z |
| latest_content_date | 2026-09-11T02:56:58Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateRange | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publishPlace | Macau |
| publisher | Instituto Cultural de Macau |
| publisherStr | Instituto Cultural de Macau |
| record_format | zotero |
| spelling | ICAS 8 AND THE RISE OF ASIA第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起 The article argues that the “rise of Asia” should be interpreted not only as a material phenomenon—expressed by the increasing regional economic and political weight—but also as an epistemological challenge to the social sciences and humanities. From this premise, the text maintains that theoretical categories inherited predominantly from the West (state and market, governance and rules, nation and identity, network and hierarchy) reveal limitations in capturing the complexity and hybridity of Asian experiences, marked by long traditions of social organization and by specific norms of power and order. Methodologically, the article operates as an institutional and evidence-based reflection on the function of the International Convention of Asian Scholars (ICAS): by analyzing the relevance of ICAS 8—held in Macau in June 2013—the author identifies how the diversity of participants and the transcontinental circulation of research create a privileged space to “recalibrate” conceptual vocabularies and produce more adequate analytical tools. It concludes that the rapid transformations experienced in multiple Asian countries offer a comparative historical laboratory capable of highlighting recurring paradoxes (electoral competition with daily control, nationalist ideologies with local fragmentations, market liberalization with state monopolies) and, thus, driving the theoretical renewal necessary to understand “Asia” in a substantive manner. Instituto Cultural de Macau Macau Review of Culture Articles 2014 Tak-Wing Ngo |
| spellingShingle | ICAS 8 AND THE RISE OF ASIA第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起 Tak-Wing Ngo |
| title | ICAS 8 AND THE RISE OF ASIA第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起 |
| title_autocomplete | ICAS 8 AND THE RISE OF ASIA第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起 |
| title_full | ICAS 8 AND THE RISE OF ASIA第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起 |
| title_fullStr | ICAS 8 AND THE RISE OF ASIA第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起 |
| title_full_unstemmed | ICAS 8 AND THE RISE OF ASIA第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起 |
| title_short | ICAS 8 AND THE RISE OF ASIA第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起 |
| title_sort | icas 8 and the rise of asia第八届國際亞洲學者會議及亞洲崛起 |
| url | https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40045/2400 |
| zotero_collection_key | 76L3BRGH |