PORTUGUESE AND INDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS. COMMONALITY AND SUPERIORITY IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢

Michael Pearson's article examines the relationships between Portuguese and Indian medical systems in the early modern period, arguing that the interaction did not produce a uniform transfer of knowledge: in some domains, commonality and the possibility of mutual exchange are observed; in others, ea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Michael Pearson
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau October 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40020/3740
_version_ 1877196270962999296
author Michael Pearson
author_autocomplete Michael Pearson
author_browse Michael Pearson
author_facet Michael Pearson
Michael Pearson
author_sort Michael Pearson
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 20
container_volume_str 20
description Michael Pearson's article examines the relationships between Portuguese and Indian medical systems in the early modern period, arguing that the interaction did not produce a uniform transfer of knowledge: in some domains, commonality and the possibility of mutual exchange are observed; in others, early signs of European advantage emerge, though initially limited. The methodology consists of a historical and comparative reconstruction of the Eurasian medical environment before the sixteenth century, followed by a progressive focus on India, and in particular on Goa, assessing the main health risks and associated healing practices. Pearson contrasts the epidemiological profile of Portugal and Europe—marked by plague, smallpox, and syphilis, in addition to endemic diseases and nutritional fragilities—with European perceptions and classifications of illnesses considered “specific” to certain regions, including interpretations of differences between Indian and European pathologies. He concludes that, although neither Europe, nor the Muslim world, nor India held a general medical “superiority” at that time, the identification of geographically localized diseases and the persistent circulation of ideas and practices paved the way for European advantage to expand over the following centuries. This process would culminate, in the nineteenth century, in the victory of Western medicine over Asian medical knowledge and practices.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:54Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-JLBI47II
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:54Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:54Z
publishDate October 2006
publishDateRange 2006
publishDateSort 2006
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling PORTUGUESE AND INDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS. COMMONALITY AND SUPERIORITY IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢
Michael Pearson's article examines the relationships between Portuguese and Indian medical systems in the early modern period, arguing that the interaction did not produce a uniform transfer of knowledge: in some domains, commonality and the possibility of mutual exchange are observed; in others, early signs of European advantage emerge, though initially limited. The methodology consists of a historical and comparative reconstruction of the Eurasian medical environment before the sixteenth century, followed by a progressive focus on India, and in particular on Goa, assessing the main health risks and associated healing practices. Pearson contrasts the epidemiological profile of Portugal and Europe—marked by plague, smallpox, and syphilis, in addition to endemic diseases and nutritional fragilities—with European perceptions and classifications of illnesses considered “specific” to certain regions, including interpretations of differences between Indian and European pathologies. He concludes that, although neither Europe, nor the Muslim world, nor India held a general medical “superiority” at that time, the identification of geographically localized diseases and the persistent circulation of ideas and practices paved the way for European advantage to expand over the following centuries. This process would culminate, in the nineteenth century, in the victory of Western medicine over Asian medical knowledge and practices.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
October 2006
Michael Pearson
spellingShingle PORTUGUESE AND INDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS. COMMONALITY AND SUPERIORITY IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢
Michael Pearson
title PORTUGUESE AND INDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS. COMMONALITY AND SUPERIORITY IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢
title_autocomplete PORTUGUESE AND INDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS. COMMONALITY AND SUPERIORITY IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢
title_full PORTUGUESE AND INDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS. COMMONALITY AND SUPERIORITY IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢
title_fullStr PORTUGUESE AND INDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS. COMMONALITY AND SUPERIORITY IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢
title_full_unstemmed PORTUGUESE AND INDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS. COMMONALITY AND SUPERIORITY IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢
title_short PORTUGUESE AND INDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS. COMMONALITY AND SUPERIORITY IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢
title_sort portuguese and indian medical systems. commonality and superiority in the early modern period近世葡萄牙和印度醫療系統的共通點及優勢
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40020/3740
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH