ON THE BORDER GATE : JOÃO MARIA FERREIRA DO AMARAL AND VICENTE NICOLAU DE MESQUITA臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打

Starting from the symbolism of Macao's **Portas do Cerco** (Border Gate) and the two dates engraved on opposite sides of the wall (August 22 and 25, 1849), this article analyzes how Portuguese colonial memory was materialized and contested over time. The author focuses on the figures of **João Maria...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Christina Miu Bing Cheng
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau January 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40033/3560
_version_ 1877196270608580608
author Christina Miu Bing Cheng
author_autocomplete Christina Miu Bing Cheng
author_browse Christina Miu Bing Cheng
author_facet Christina Miu Bing Cheng
Christina Miu Bing Cheng
author_sort Christina Miu Bing Cheng
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 33
container_volume_str 33
description Starting from the symbolism of Macao's **Portas do Cerco** (Border Gate) and the two dates engraved on opposite sides of the wall (August 22 and 25, 1849), this article analyzes how Portuguese colonial memory was materialized and contested over time. The author focuses on the figures of **João Maria Ferreira do Amaral** and **Vicente Nicolau de Mesquita**, understood less as isolated historical individuals than as supports for a political narrative constructed to legitimize Portuguese authority. Methodologically, the text mobilizes a historiographical discussion on the “ambiguity” of history—as a situated narrative—by cross-referencing the reading of the monument and the inscribed dates with the public trajectory of the two statues (inauguration in **1940**, removals in **1966** and **1992**, and the return of the artifact to Portugal), as well as with the way in which colonial and Sino-local authorities disputed the meaning of “aggressors” and “patriots.” It concludes that the statues constituted devices for **consolidating power** and **selecting memories**: in a context of empire and colonialism, history was reconstructed “in favor of the victor,” but also left traces of trauma that re-emerged when the political order changed. Thus, the Portas do Cerco functions as a spatial archive of a memory in conflict and in continuous rewriting.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:56Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-LSCWC476
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:56Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:56Z
publishDate January 2010
publishDateRange 2010
publishDateSort 2010
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling ON THE BORDER GATE : JOÃO MARIA FERREIRA DO AMARAL AND VICENTE NICOLAU DE MESQUITA臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打
Starting from the symbolism of Macao's **Portas do Cerco** (Border Gate) and the two dates engraved on opposite sides of the wall (August 22 and 25, 1849), this article analyzes how Portuguese colonial memory was materialized and contested over time. The author focuses on the figures of **João Maria Ferreira do Amaral** and **Vicente Nicolau de Mesquita**, understood less as isolated historical individuals than as supports for a political narrative constructed to legitimize Portuguese authority. Methodologically, the text mobilizes a historiographical discussion on the “ambiguity” of history—as a situated narrative—by cross-referencing the reading of the monument and the inscribed dates with the public trajectory of the two statues (inauguration in **1940**, removals in **1966** and **1992**, and the return of the artifact to Portugal), as well as with the way in which colonial and Sino-local authorities disputed the meaning of “aggressors” and “patriots.” It concludes that the statues constituted devices for **consolidating power** and **selecting memories**: in a context of empire and colonialism, history was reconstructed “in favor of the victor,” but also left traces of trauma that re-emerged when the political order changed. Thus, the Portas do Cerco functions as a spatial archive of a memory in conflict and in continuous rewriting.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
January 2010
Christina Miu Bing Cheng
spellingShingle ON THE BORDER GATE : JOÃO MARIA FERREIRA DO AMARAL AND VICENTE NICOLAU DE MESQUITA臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打
Christina Miu Bing Cheng
title ON THE BORDER GATE : JOÃO MARIA FERREIRA DO AMARAL AND VICENTE NICOLAU DE MESQUITA臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打
title_autocomplete ON THE BORDER GATE : JOÃO MARIA FERREIRA DO AMARAL AND VICENTE NICOLAU DE MESQUITA臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打
title_full ON THE BORDER GATE : JOÃO MARIA FERREIRA DO AMARAL AND VICENTE NICOLAU DE MESQUITA臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打
title_fullStr ON THE BORDER GATE : JOÃO MARIA FERREIRA DO AMARAL AND VICENTE NICOLAU DE MESQUITA臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打
title_full_unstemmed ON THE BORDER GATE : JOÃO MARIA FERREIRA DO AMARAL AND VICENTE NICOLAU DE MESQUITA臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打
title_short ON THE BORDER GATE : JOÃO MARIA FERREIRA DO AMARAL AND VICENTE NICOLAU DE MESQUITA臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打
title_sort on the border gate : joão maria ferreira do amaral and vicente nicolau de mesquita臨界之上──亞馬喇和美士基打
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40033/3560
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH