SOBRE UMA PROPOSTA DE PUBLICAÇÃO DOS POEMAS DE CAMILO PESSANHA關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議

The article by Paulo Franchetti proposes and justifies a publication strategy for the poems of Camilo Pessanha, arguing that a "critical edition" in the usual sense — that is, oriented toward the fixation of a canonical text and the reconstruction of the "most secure" version — is not adequate for t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Paulo Franchetti
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40049/2333
_version_ 1877196270070661120
author Paulo Franchetti
author_autocomplete Paulo Franchetti
author_browse Paulo Franchetti
author_facet Paulo Franchetti
Paulo Franchetti
author_sort Paulo Franchetti
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 49
container_volume_str 49
description The article by Paulo Franchetti proposes and justifies a publication strategy for the poems of Camilo Pessanha, arguing that a "critical edition" in the usual sense — that is, oriented toward the fixation of a canonical text and the reconstruction of the "most secure" version — is not adequate for the Pessanha case. Rather than enclosing the work in a definitive form or organizing the poems by thematic/formal criteria, the author advocates a "radical" approach in the botanical sense: privileging the historical description of the poems, tracing both authorial elaboration (dating, identification of earliest versions where possible, and inventory of successive alterations up to the last provably authorial version) and their public history (copies by third parties and dispersed publications, culminating in volume editions). Methodologically, Franchetti takes as his point of reference the frozen moment of the last provably authorial form, so as to allow the reader to traverse, on the basis of extensively documented information, the "paths" of textual transformation. The article acknowledges, however, interpretive limits: in some cases, the authority of a "clean" version is strained by later publications by the author himself, and in certain texts one cannot reliably discern where the process of correction came to an end. It is concluded that the purpose of publication is to offer the reader the maximum amount of data so that he or she may choose the most pertinent "textual moment," without any pretension of neutralizing the plurality of versions.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:59Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-R3DL6TWJ
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:59Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:59Z
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling SOBRE UMA PROPOSTA DE PUBLICAÇÃO DOS POEMAS DE CAMILO PESSANHA關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議
The article by Paulo Franchetti proposes and justifies a publication strategy for the poems of Camilo Pessanha, arguing that a "critical edition" in the usual sense — that is, oriented toward the fixation of a canonical text and the reconstruction of the "most secure" version — is not adequate for the Pessanha case. Rather than enclosing the work in a definitive form or organizing the poems by thematic/formal criteria, the author advocates a "radical" approach in the botanical sense: privileging the historical description of the poems, tracing both authorial elaboration (dating, identification of earliest versions where possible, and inventory of successive alterations up to the last provably authorial version) and their public history (copies by third parties and dispersed publications, culminating in volume editions). Methodologically, Franchetti takes as his point of reference the frozen moment of the last provably authorial form, so as to allow the reader to traverse, on the basis of extensively documented information, the "paths" of textual transformation. The article acknowledges, however, interpretive limits: in some cases, the authority of a "clean" version is strained by later publications by the author himself, and in certain texts one cannot reliably discern where the process of correction came to an end. It is concluded that the purpose of publication is to offer the reader the maximum amount of data so that he or she may choose the most pertinent "textual moment," without any pretension of neutralizing the plurality of versions.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
2015
Paulo Franchetti
spellingShingle SOBRE UMA PROPOSTA DE PUBLICAÇÃO DOS POEMAS DE CAMILO PESSANHA關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議
Paulo Franchetti
title SOBRE UMA PROPOSTA DE PUBLICAÇÃO DOS POEMAS DE CAMILO PESSANHA關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議
title_autocomplete SOBRE UMA PROPOSTA DE PUBLICAÇÃO DOS POEMAS DE CAMILO PESSANHA關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議
title_full SOBRE UMA PROPOSTA DE PUBLICAÇÃO DOS POEMAS DE CAMILO PESSANHA關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議
title_fullStr SOBRE UMA PROPOSTA DE PUBLICAÇÃO DOS POEMAS DE CAMILO PESSANHA關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議
title_full_unstemmed SOBRE UMA PROPOSTA DE PUBLICAÇÃO DOS POEMAS DE CAMILO PESSANHA關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議
title_short SOBRE UMA PROPOSTA DE PUBLICAÇÃO DOS POEMAS DE CAMILO PESSANHA關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議
title_sort sobre uma proposta de publicação dos poemas de camilo pessanha關於庇山耶詩歌的一項出版建議
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40049/2333
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH