THE STUDY OF PARSEE MERCHANTS IN CANTON, HONG KONG AND MACAO

This article argues that Parsees were central to the modernization of China—notably in Canton, Hong Kong, and Macao—through mercantile networks, the opium trade, and Sino-Western relations, yet their role remains neglected in Chinese historiography and only partially treated in Western scholarship....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Guo Deyan
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau October 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40008/3880
_version_ 1877196271360409600
author Guo Deyan
author_autocomplete Guo Deyan
author_browse Guo Deyan
author_facet Guo Deyan
Guo Deyan
author_sort Guo Deyan
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 8
container_volume_str 8
description This article argues that Parsees were central to the modernization of China—notably in Canton, Hong Kong, and Macao—through mercantile networks, the opium trade, and Sino-Western relations, yet their role remains neglected in Chinese historiography and only partially treated in Western scholarship. The central claim is that this neglect stems from the instability and ambiguity of referring terms for “Parsee” in Qing-dynasty sources, which obscures by-name identifications of individuals and families across multilingual archives. To remedy this, Guo Deyan proposes a source-critical, cross-linguistic method: first examine Western-language records, then systematically sift Chinese-language materials from Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Macao to identify specific Parsees and their family networks, rather than treating them as a homogeneous foreign category or as mere participants in broad events. The study emphasizes the importance of tracing proper names within Qing documents, which more reliably indicate Parsee presence than generic labels. Methodologically, the article combines Chinese archival materials with Western sources, including translations and references in British parliamentary papers, and supplements textual evidence with material-culture data (e.g., Parsee cemetery inscriptions) to illuminate the mercantile landscape. Key conclusions stress that, once names and lineages are reconstructed, Parsees appear as active agents in port-town economies, with meaningful involvement in trade, shipping, and the opium era—an insight that enlarges Macao’s minority history and calls for standardized, name-centered approaches in future research.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:52Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-RMLEL837
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:52Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:52Z
publishDate October 2003
publishDateRange 2003
publishDateSort 2003
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling THE STUDY OF PARSEE MERCHANTS IN CANTON, HONG KONG AND MACAO
This article argues that Parsees were central to the modernization of China—notably in Canton, Hong Kong, and Macao—through mercantile networks, the opium trade, and Sino-Western relations, yet their role remains neglected in Chinese historiography and only partially treated in Western scholarship. The central claim is that this neglect stems from the instability and ambiguity of referring terms for “Parsee” in Qing-dynasty sources, which obscures by-name identifications of individuals and families across multilingual archives. To remedy this, Guo Deyan proposes a source-critical, cross-linguistic method: first examine Western-language records, then systematically sift Chinese-language materials from Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Macao to identify specific Parsees and their family networks, rather than treating them as a homogeneous foreign category or as mere participants in broad events. The study emphasizes the importance of tracing proper names within Qing documents, which more reliably indicate Parsee presence than generic labels. Methodologically, the article combines Chinese archival materials with Western sources, including translations and references in British parliamentary papers, and supplements textual evidence with material-culture data (e.g., Parsee cemetery inscriptions) to illuminate the mercantile landscape. Key conclusions stress that, once names and lineages are reconstructed, Parsees appear as active agents in port-town economies, with meaningful involvement in trade, shipping, and the opium era—an insight that enlarges Macao’s minority history and calls for standardized, name-centered approaches in future research.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
October 2003
Guo Deyan
spellingShingle THE STUDY OF PARSEE MERCHANTS IN CANTON, HONG KONG AND MACAO
Guo Deyan
title THE STUDY OF PARSEE MERCHANTS IN CANTON, HONG KONG AND MACAO
title_autocomplete THE STUDY OF PARSEE MERCHANTS IN CANTON, HONG KONG AND MACAO
title_full THE STUDY OF PARSEE MERCHANTS IN CANTON, HONG KONG AND MACAO
title_fullStr THE STUDY OF PARSEE MERCHANTS IN CANTON, HONG KONG AND MACAO
title_full_unstemmed THE STUDY OF PARSEE MERCHANTS IN CANTON, HONG KONG AND MACAO
title_short THE STUDY OF PARSEE MERCHANTS IN CANTON, HONG KONG AND MACAO
title_sort the study of parsee merchants in canton, hong kong and macao
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40008/3880
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH