COOPERATION AND CONTRADICTION : PORTUGAL AND THE HOLY SEE IN THE ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS IN CHINA IN 17-18TH CENTURIES

This study examines the intertwined trajectories of cooperation and contradiction between Portugal and the Holy See in the administration of Catholic ecclesiastical affairs in China during the 17th–18th centuries. It argues that the Padroado Real, while enabling Portugal to sponsor churches and appo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Gu Wei-min
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau April 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40002/2666
_version_ 1877196271510355968
author Gu Wei-min
author_autocomplete Gu Wei-min
author_browse Gu Wei-min
author_facet Gu Wei-min
Gu Wei-min
author_sort Gu Wei-min
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 2
container_volume_str 2
description This study examines the intertwined trajectories of cooperation and contradiction between Portugal and the Holy See in the administration of Catholic ecclesiastical affairs in China during the 17th–18th centuries. It argues that the Padroado Real, while enabling Portugal to sponsor churches and appoint clergy across its Asian empire, repeatedly collided with Rome’s efforts to regulate mission governance from the center, prompting a structural shift toward centralized papal control via the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith and the deployment of Vicars-Apostolic. Employing a documentary-historical method, the article analyzes papal bulls, royal privileges, apostolic acts, and mission correspondences, alongside local Chinese and Macanese records, to uncover how authorities negotiated jurisdiction, resource allocation, and doctrinal strategy. The findings show a persistent, pragmatic cooperation: Lisbon provided logistics, local knowledge, and patronage networks that sustained missions in a difficult field; Rome supplied doctrinal direction, mission standardization, and institutional oversight to ensure uniformity across diverse theatres. Yet contradictions were equally salient: conflicts over nomination rights, episcopal authority, and the reach of papal decrees, as well as tensions in adapting to Chinese religious, political, and cultural contexts. The analysis concludes that the 17th–18th-century Catholic presence in China emerged from a dynamic compromise between imperial patronage and papal centralization, a pattern that shaped the governance of ecclesiastical affairs in Macao and beyond.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:50Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-UA2ZMEU8
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:50Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:50Z
publishDate April 2002
publishDateRange 2002
publishDateSort 2002
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling COOPERATION AND CONTRADICTION : PORTUGAL AND THE HOLY SEE IN THE ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS IN CHINA IN 17-18TH CENTURIES
This study examines the intertwined trajectories of cooperation and contradiction between Portugal and the Holy See in the administration of Catholic ecclesiastical affairs in China during the 17th–18th centuries. It argues that the Padroado Real, while enabling Portugal to sponsor churches and appoint clergy across its Asian empire, repeatedly collided with Rome’s efforts to regulate mission governance from the center, prompting a structural shift toward centralized papal control via the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith and the deployment of Vicars-Apostolic. Employing a documentary-historical method, the article analyzes papal bulls, royal privileges, apostolic acts, and mission correspondences, alongside local Chinese and Macanese records, to uncover how authorities negotiated jurisdiction, resource allocation, and doctrinal strategy. The findings show a persistent, pragmatic cooperation: Lisbon provided logistics, local knowledge, and patronage networks that sustained missions in a difficult field; Rome supplied doctrinal direction, mission standardization, and institutional oversight to ensure uniformity across diverse theatres. Yet contradictions were equally salient: conflicts over nomination rights, episcopal authority, and the reach of papal decrees, as well as tensions in adapting to Chinese religious, political, and cultural contexts. The analysis concludes that the 17th–18th-century Catholic presence in China emerged from a dynamic compromise between imperial patronage and papal centralization, a pattern that shaped the governance of ecclesiastical affairs in Macao and beyond.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
April 2002
Gu Wei-min
spellingShingle COOPERATION AND CONTRADICTION : PORTUGAL AND THE HOLY SEE IN THE ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS IN CHINA IN 17-18TH CENTURIES
Gu Wei-min
title COOPERATION AND CONTRADICTION : PORTUGAL AND THE HOLY SEE IN THE ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS IN CHINA IN 17-18TH CENTURIES
title_autocomplete COOPERATION AND CONTRADICTION : PORTUGAL AND THE HOLY SEE IN THE ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS IN CHINA IN 17-18TH CENTURIES
title_full COOPERATION AND CONTRADICTION : PORTUGAL AND THE HOLY SEE IN THE ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS IN CHINA IN 17-18TH CENTURIES
title_fullStr COOPERATION AND CONTRADICTION : PORTUGAL AND THE HOLY SEE IN THE ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS IN CHINA IN 17-18TH CENTURIES
title_full_unstemmed COOPERATION AND CONTRADICTION : PORTUGAL AND THE HOLY SEE IN THE ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS IN CHINA IN 17-18TH CENTURIES
title_short COOPERATION AND CONTRADICTION : PORTUGAL AND THE HOLY SEE IN THE ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS IN CHINA IN 17-18TH CENTURIES
title_sort cooperation and contradiction : portugal and the holy see in the ecclesiastical affairs in china in 17-18th centuries
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40002/2666
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH