F.-X. D’ENTRECOLLES S. J. AND CHINESE MEDICINE. A JESUIT’S INSIGHTS IN THE FRENCH CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING SMALLPOX INOCULATION殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論

The article analyzes the 1726 letter from François-Xavier D’Entrecolles, S.J., to Jean Baptiste Du Halde, taking it as a Jesuit intervention in the French controversy over smallpox inoculation. The author argues that the text constitutes not merely an ethnographic account of “how” the technique was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Beatriz Puente Ballesteros
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau April 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40018/3766
_version_ 1877196271044788224
author Beatriz Puente Ballesteros
author_autocomplete Beatriz Puente Ballesteros
author_browse Beatriz Puente Ballesteros
author_facet Beatriz Puente Ballesteros
Beatriz Puente Ballesteros
author_sort Beatriz Puente Ballesteros
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 18
container_volume_str 18
description The article analyzes the 1726 letter from François-Xavier D’Entrecolles, S.J., to Jean Baptiste Du Halde, taking it as a Jesuit intervention in the French controversy over smallpox inoculation. The author argues that the text constitutes not merely an ethnographic account of “how” the technique was practiced in China, but a deliberative exercise that simultaneously articulates medical, philosophical, and religious dimensions. Methodologically, the research conducts a contextualized reading of the epistolary corpus, confronting the theological framework of the Catholic stance of the Society of Jesus with the arguments debated in French scientific periodicals and within the clash between medical currents, especially the opposition between institutional conservatism and the reception of foreign innovations. It concludes that D’Entrecolles, while informed by the European intellectual environment, defends inoculation by resorting to comparison with Chinese procedures and to the idea that local medical theories could enrich European knowledge. The article also highlights how the controversy in France involved three fronts—physicians, *philosophes*, and the Church—and how Jesuit authority allowed missionary observation to be converted into argumentative legitimacy within debates on prevention, risk, and “divine plans.”
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:53Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-V8VQ69XT
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:53Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:53Z
publishDate April 2006
publishDateRange 2006
publishDateSort 2006
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling F.-X. D’ENTRECOLLES S. J. AND CHINESE MEDICINE. A JESUIT’S INSIGHTS IN THE FRENCH CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING SMALLPOX INOCULATION殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論
The article analyzes the 1726 letter from François-Xavier D’Entrecolles, S.J., to Jean Baptiste Du Halde, taking it as a Jesuit intervention in the French controversy over smallpox inoculation. The author argues that the text constitutes not merely an ethnographic account of “how” the technique was practiced in China, but a deliberative exercise that simultaneously articulates medical, philosophical, and religious dimensions. Methodologically, the research conducts a contextualized reading of the epistolary corpus, confronting the theological framework of the Catholic stance of the Society of Jesus with the arguments debated in French scientific periodicals and within the clash between medical currents, especially the opposition between institutional conservatism and the reception of foreign innovations. It concludes that D’Entrecolles, while informed by the European intellectual environment, defends inoculation by resorting to comparison with Chinese procedures and to the idea that local medical theories could enrich European knowledge. The article also highlights how the controversy in France involved three fronts—physicians, *philosophes*, and the Church—and how Jesuit authority allowed missionary observation to be converted into argumentative legitimacy within debates on prevention, risk, and “divine plans.”
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
April 2006
Beatriz Puente Ballesteros
spellingShingle F.-X. D’ENTRECOLLES S. J. AND CHINESE MEDICINE. A JESUIT’S INSIGHTS IN THE FRENCH CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING SMALLPOX INOCULATION殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論
Beatriz Puente Ballesteros
title F.-X. D’ENTRECOLLES S. J. AND CHINESE MEDICINE. A JESUIT’S INSIGHTS IN THE FRENCH CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING SMALLPOX INOCULATION殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論
title_autocomplete F.-X. D’ENTRECOLLES S. J. AND CHINESE MEDICINE. A JESUIT’S INSIGHTS IN THE FRENCH CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING SMALLPOX INOCULATION殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論
title_full F.-X. D’ENTRECOLLES S. J. AND CHINESE MEDICINE. A JESUIT’S INSIGHTS IN THE FRENCH CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING SMALLPOX INOCULATION殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論
title_fullStr F.-X. D’ENTRECOLLES S. J. AND CHINESE MEDICINE. A JESUIT’S INSIGHTS IN THE FRENCH CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING SMALLPOX INOCULATION殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論
title_full_unstemmed F.-X. D’ENTRECOLLES S. J. AND CHINESE MEDICINE. A JESUIT’S INSIGHTS IN THE FRENCH CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING SMALLPOX INOCULATION殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論
title_short F.-X. D’ENTRECOLLES S. J. AND CHINESE MEDICINE. A JESUIT’S INSIGHTS IN THE FRENCH CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING SMALLPOX INOCULATION殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論
title_sort f.-x. d’entrecolles s. j. and chinese medicine. a jesuit’s insights in the french controversy surrounding smallpox inoculation殷弘緒神父和中醫:了解法國對接種牛痘疫苗的爭論
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40018/3766
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH