THE FUTURE OF MACAO’S PAST : AN EPILOGUE
David Lung’s epilogue to the Macao Vision Conference synthesizes expert positions on how Macao should translate its cultural heritage into lasting urban, economic, and social benefits. The central argument contends that Macao’s future hinges on embedding its past into long-term planning—not merely t...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Review of Culture |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Articles |
| Published: |
Instituto Cultural de Macau
October 2002
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40004/2688 |
| Summary: | David Lung’s epilogue to the Macao Vision Conference synthesizes expert positions on how Macao should translate its cultural heritage into lasting urban, economic, and social benefits. The central argument contends that Macao’s future hinges on embedding its past into long-term planning—not merely to bolster image or UNESCO credentials, but to yield tangible community gains through a culturally sophisticated public realm, sustainable urban design, and a diversified heritage-based economy. The author structures the synthesis around three interlocking axes: (1) cultural significance—heritage as the defining identity of Macao and as a conduit between East and West, whose preservation fosters pride, belonging, and social cohesion; (2) conservation and urban development—policy and practice for safeguarding built heritage amid rapid modernization, ensuring authentic, well-managed development within the “one country, two systems” framework; and (3) economic value—leveraging heritage for tourism, entertainment, conventions, and related industries as engines of sustainable growth. Methodologically, the piece functions as a meta-synthesis of conference proceedings and professional insights, including opening reflections by Dr. Tse and framing by the Chief Executive Edmund Ho. Conclusions advocate education of Macao’s citizens—especially youth—as the critical driver of realization, calling for long-term investment in heritage facilities, governance structures, and public engagement to build a resilient, culturally rich metropolis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1682-1106 |