MACAU E MANILA NO ARBITRISMO IBÉRICO在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉

This article analyzes the presence and circulation of Iberian *arbitrismo*, taking the colonial spaces of Macau and Manila as case studies, and seeks to understand how discourses of *arbítrios* (technical-political and fiscal proposals directed at royal authority) were mobilized to address conjunctu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Culture
Main Author: Eduardo Frutuoso
Format: Articles
Published: Instituto Cultural de Macau July 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40023/3707
_version_ 1877196270880161792
author Eduardo Frutuoso
author_autocomplete Eduardo Frutuoso
author_browse Eduardo Frutuoso
author_facet Eduardo Frutuoso
Eduardo Frutuoso
author_sort Eduardo Frutuoso
container_title Review of Culture
container_title_str Review of Culture
container_volume 23
container_volume_str 23
description This article analyzes the presence and circulation of Iberian *arbitrismo*, taking the colonial spaces of Macau and Manila as case studies, and seeks to understand how discourses of *arbítrios* (technical-political and fiscal proposals directed at royal authority) were mobilized to address conjunctures of crisis, financing, and governability within the Spanish imperial system and, in articulation, within the Luso-Asian universe. The central argument holds that, beyond mere reformist rhetoric, *arbítrios* functioned as mechanisms of mediation between local observers and decision-making centers, converting mercantile, administrative, and maritime experiences into suggested solutions—often with a strong fiscal bent and generating tensions vis-à-vis representative bodies. Methodologically, the approach rests on a historical-semantic contextualization of *arbitrismo* and of the agent known as the *arbitrista*, articulated with the reading and framing of the opinions and proposals related to these two Far Eastern nodes. It concludes that the circulation of these texts reconfigured administrative practices and expectations of rewards (*mercês*) and, simultaneously, contributed to the construction of an ambivalent image of the *arbitrista*, marked by criticisms of extravagance, opportunism, and increased burdens on populations and privileges.
first_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:54Z
format Articles
genre Articles
genre_facet Articles
hierarchy_browse Review of Culture{{{_ID_}}}zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_id zotero-coll-76L3BRGH
hierarchy_parent_title Review of Culture
hierarchy_sequence 0000
hierarchy_top_id zotero-coll-WX87PJHD
hierarchy_top_title News
hierarchytype Default
id zotero-YFBGHMBM
institution zotero_group
issn 1682-1106
last_indexed 2026-09-11T02:56:54Z
latest_content_date 2026-09-11T02:56:54Z
publishDate July 2007
publishDateRange 2007
publishDateSort 2007
publishPlace Macau
publisher Instituto Cultural de Macau
publisherStr Instituto Cultural de Macau
record_format zotero
spelling MACAU E MANILA NO ARBITRISMO IBÉRICO在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉
This article analyzes the presence and circulation of Iberian *arbitrismo*, taking the colonial spaces of Macau and Manila as case studies, and seeks to understand how discourses of *arbítrios* (technical-political and fiscal proposals directed at royal authority) were mobilized to address conjunctures of crisis, financing, and governability within the Spanish imperial system and, in articulation, within the Luso-Asian universe. The central argument holds that, beyond mere reformist rhetoric, *arbítrios* functioned as mechanisms of mediation between local observers and decision-making centers, converting mercantile, administrative, and maritime experiences into suggested solutions—often with a strong fiscal bent and generating tensions vis-à-vis representative bodies. Methodologically, the approach rests on a historical-semantic contextualization of *arbitrismo* and of the agent known as the *arbitrista*, articulated with the reading and framing of the opinions and proposals related to these two Far Eastern nodes. It concludes that the circulation of these texts reconfigured administrative practices and expectations of rewards (*mercês*) and, simultaneously, contributed to the construction of an ambivalent image of the *arbitrista*, marked by criticisms of extravagance, opportunism, and increased burdens on populations and privileges.
Instituto Cultural de Macau
Macau
Review of Culture
Articles
July 2007
Eduardo Frutuoso
spellingShingle MACAU E MANILA NO ARBITRISMO IBÉRICO在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉
Eduardo Frutuoso
title MACAU E MANILA NO ARBITRISMO IBÉRICO在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉
title_autocomplete MACAU E MANILA NO ARBITRISMO IBÉRICO在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉
title_full MACAU E MANILA NO ARBITRISMO IBÉRICO在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉
title_fullStr MACAU E MANILA NO ARBITRISMO IBÉRICO在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉
title_full_unstemmed MACAU E MANILA NO ARBITRISMO IBÉRICO在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉
title_short MACAU E MANILA NO ARBITRISMO IBÉRICO在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉
title_sort macau e manila no arbitrismo ibérico在伊比利亞仲裁主義中的澳門和馬尼拉
url https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/pdfViewerParts/40023/3707
zotero_collection_key 76L3BRGH