Inquisicao Teste 2
This abstract describes a mid-nineteenth-century Portuguese royal decree, preserved in multiple manuscript copies within the Arquivo da Marinha e do Ultramar at the Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal. The document is a formal instrument of royal assent, issued by the Portuguese monarch at the petition...
Saved in:
| Format: | Manuscripts |
|---|---|
| Subjects: |
Addressee Appearance Requirement
;
Afonso Peres
;
António Roiz
;
Bureaucratic Practice
;
Citation Compliance
;
Civic Office Roles
;
Extension Request
;
Formal Procedural Record
;
Iberian legal practices
;
Inquisition
;
Judge Refusal
;
Judicial Notice Delivery
;
Judicial Protocol
;
Legal Service Procedure
;
Lisbon administrative document
;
Lopo Roiz
;
Margin Attestation
;
Municipal Chamber Clerk
;
Pero Da Fonseca
;
Porter Delivery
;
Portuguese judicial citation
;
Procedural Accommodations
;
St Michael feast
;
Toothache Departure
;
early modern Portugal
;
Manuscripts
|
| Online Access: | https://macau-legacy.usj.edu.mo/docs/LNYVCRPA/viewer_LNYVCRPA.html |
| Summary: | This abstract describes a mid-nineteenth-century Portuguese royal decree, preserved in multiple manuscript copies within the Arquivo da Marinha e do Ultramar at the Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal. The document is a formal instrument of royal assent, issued by the Portuguese monarch at the petition of Queen Maria II—referred to with pious formulae indicating her death prior to issuance—and countersigned by João da Silva. It records the granting of an unspecified request or petition, the precise nature of which remains redacted or omitted in the surviving fragments. The decree bears repeated circular archival stamps identifying its provenance and institutional custody. Marginalia marked ‘F’ appear consistently in the top left corner of each page. Geographical notations—Portugal, Brazil, East Africa, West Africa, India, Mozambique, Timor, and Macau—suggest administrative scope or jurisdictional relevance tied to the Portuguese maritime and colonial administration. As a primary source, the document reflects formal protocols of monarchical authority, bureaucratic practice, and imperial governance within the Portuguese Empire during the reign of Maria II (1834–1853) and the subsequent regency or reign of her successor. Its repetitive textual variants across pages indicate either draft iterations or archival duplication practices common in official record-keeping of the period. Researchers should note the absence of explicit subject matter beyond the procedural affirmation of royal consent, necessitating contextual corroboration for full interpretation. |
|---|